On 11/07/17 18:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:59:00AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > @@ -4065,6 +4067,9 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
> > }
> >
> > if (user) {
> > + if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_SPECIAL)
> > + return -EPERM;
>
> Should be -EINVAL I think, as if the bit didn't exist at all (it
> doesn't, from a userspace perspective).
> Makes sense. I'll change it. Thanks, - Juri
