On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:30:31PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> writes: > > > > The ORC data format does have a few downsides compared to DWARF. The > > ORC unwind tables take up ~1MB more memory than DWARF eh_frame tables. > > > Can we have an option to just use dwarf instead? For people > who don't want to waste a MB+ to solve a problem that doesn't > exist (as proven by many years of opensuse kernel experience) > > As far as I can tell this whole thing has only downsides compared > to the dwarf unwinder that was earlier proposed. I don't see > a single advantage.
Improved speed, reliability, maintainability. Are those not advantages? -- Josh
