Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> writes: > > The ORC data format does have a few downsides compared to DWARF. The > ORC unwind tables take up ~1MB more memory than DWARF eh_frame tables. > Can we have an option to just use dwarf instead? For people who don't want to waste a MB+ to solve a problem that doesn't exist (as proven by many years of opensuse kernel experience)
As far as I can tell this whole thing has only downsides compared to the dwarf unwinder that was earlier proposed. I don't see a single advantage. -Andi
