Hi! > > > So why exactly isn't it reasonable? > > > > > > Please use technical arguments. Saying that something is wrong without > > > explaining the problem you see with it isn't particulatly useful in > > > technical > > > discussions. > > > > Deep in your heart, you should know that having enum listing all the > > platforms linux > > runs on is a very bad idea. > > Even so, if I'm unable to explain to people why this is a bad idea in > technical > terms, that doesn't mean too much.
I could say something O(#drivers * #platforms) vs. O(#drivers +
#platforms) lines of code -- but I thought it was obvious...?
> > Anyway, there are better solutions, regulator framework already knows if
> > given rail
> > will be powered off or not, and their driver already knows if they are going
> > suspend/standby. They just need to use existing interfaces.
>
> So they need to know what has been passed to suspend_devices_and_enter()
> anyway and currently there's no interface for that. That actually is the
> source
> of the whole issue.
Yep, I don't like that, but I guess we should give drivers enough
information to ask regulator framework.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
