On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:41:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:54:56PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Okay, we're kinda off the rails now. Just to verify that we're on the > > same page, are you also saying that the following should be a valid > > configuration? > > > > R (D) > > | > > A (D and has processes in it and controllers enabled) > > | > > C (D and has processes in it) > > > > Argh, the no internal process thing again -- I completely forgot about > that :-(
Heh, yeah, we wouldn't be talking about all these otherwise. The restriction is pain in the ass but at the same time useful for full(er)-scope resource control. Were there other things that caught your eyes? Thanks. -- tejun
