Hi, On 19.07.2017 8:48, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Alexey Budankov <alexey.budan...@linux.intel.com> writes: > >> On 18.07.2017 19:55, Alexander Shishkin wrote: >>> Alexey Budankov <alexey.budan...@linux.intel.com> writes: >>> >>>> I see. Do you personally have some more issues that needs to be addressed? >>>> My intention is that this patch v5 4/4 addresses all your comments raised >>>> in >>>> the previous reviews. >>> >>> I don't know yet, I haven't started on the actual content of the >>> patchset, it being hard to read. I'm going to wait for more readable >>> versions to look at the actual code. >> >> Is the whole final change attached to this patch v5 4/4 sufficient for you >> to proceed? > > No. As I've said yesterday here [1] and here [2], patches have to make > sense on their own. I'm sure 'submitting-patches' also has something to > that effect. > >> If not - please suggest the form which is more convenient for you. > > I've also answered this already in [3]: > >> Well, normally you'd be sending new versions of your patchset until the >> maintainers are happy with it, at which point they'd pick it up. New >> versions would address the issues pointed out during the review, also >> keeping in mind the what 'submitting-patches' says about submitting >> patches. > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150038199212005 > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150039142715304 > [3] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150039054614993
Well, ok. I see you point. Do you want me to restructure the whole patchset or clarify more on some parts of the current set? > > Regards, > -- > Alex > Thanks, Alexey
