Hi Arnaldo and Taeung,

(+ Andi)

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:47:48AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:36:55AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> > @@ -177,14 +177,12 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel 
> > *evsel,
> >      */
> >     process_branch_stack(sample->branch_stack, al, sample);
> >  
> > -   sample->period = 1;
> >     sample->weight = 1;
> > -
> >     he = hists__add_entry(hists, al, NULL, NULL, NULL, sample, true);
> >     if (he == NULL)
> >             return -ENOMEM;
> 
> I split the hunk above into a separate patch, as a fix, Namhyung, can
> you take a look at why need to unconditionally overwrite what is in
> sample->weight as well?
> 
> Looks fishy as it may come with a value from the kernel, parsed in
> perf_evsel__parse_sample(), when PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT is in
> perf_event_attr->sample_type.
> 
> Is it that the hists code needs a sane value when PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT
> isn't requested in sample_type?

It was Andi added that code originally (05484298cbfe).  IIUC the
weight is only meaningful for some CPUs with Intel TSX and he used a
dummy value.

AFAIK the hists code doesn't care of it unless weight sort key is used
(for report).  As it's not used by annotate code, I think it'd be
better leaving it as is (like period).

Thanks,
Namhyung


> 
> The resulting cset is below.
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> commit a935e8cd8d5d4b7936c4b4cf27c2d0e87d1a6a66
> Author: Taeung Song <treeze.tae...@gmail.com>
> Date:   Fri Jul 21 11:38:48 2017 -0300
> 
>     perf annotate: Do not overwrite sample->period
>     
>     In fixing the --show-total-period option it was noticed that the value
>     of sample->period was being overwritten, fix it.
>     
>     Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com>
>     Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wo...@kdab.com>
>     Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
>     Fixes: fd36f3dd7933 ("perf hist: Pass struct sample to 
> __hists__add_entry()")
>     [ split from a larger patch, added the Fixes tag ]
>     Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com>
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> index 96fe1a88c1e5..7e33278eff67 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> @@ -177,7 +177,6 @@ static int perf_evsel__add_sample(struct perf_evsel 
> *evsel,
>        */
>       process_branch_stack(sample->branch_stack, al, sample);
>  
> -     sample->period = 1;
>       sample->weight = 1;
>  
>       he = hists__add_entry(hists, al, NULL, NULL, NULL, sample, true);

Reply via email to