On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 11:04 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:59:15PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > > I think we should keep the current scheme, which registers an mci > > for > > No we shouldn't. > > > each GHES entry. ghes_edac_report_mem_error() expects that error- > > reporting is serialized per a GHES entry. Sharing a single mci > > among all GHES entries / error interfaces might lead to a race > > condition. > > See how I solved it in my patchset and feel free to reuse it.
Hmm... Sorry, I failed to see how your patchset solved it. Would you mind to explain how it is done? Thanks! -Toshi
