Hi Jamie, On 08/14, Jamie Iles wrote: > > > > Not sure, let me think a bit more... and this is not enough anyway. > > > > > > perhaps we should start with this simple change, but the "real" fix > > > needs a lot of cleanups, although I am not sure if we will ever do this. > > > > Okay, sounds good. I'm happy to spend more time looking at this if you > > have suggestions - in the context of namespaces and containers this > > seems more relevant than when it was just the system init that we were > > protecting. > > Any objections to moving ahead with this patch?
Oh, sorry. OK, lets do this simple change then try to improve this logic further. I'm afraid you need to re-send your patch, sorry. Oleg.
