Hi Philipp, Am 16.08.2017 um 11:44 schrieb Philipp Zabel: > On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 02:38 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Add a per-register reset controller driver. This deals with the fact >> that not all registers are adjoined. > > the way you handle the non-contiguous reset registers, this looks like > a candidate to join the recently discussed reset-simple driver [1]. > Could you check if that would fit?
Thanks, I appreciate the idea, and it looks like you already have the active-low logic in place. Are you okay with keeping the first three as separate nodes, or would you rather want one node to cover the first three registers, plus two separate ones for the non-contiguous cases? Or is the simple driver supposed to cover gaps, too? Then we could go with just two nodes. (I found it weird to have reset and then reset4, so I went with separate ones as seen downstream.) Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)