On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:51:02AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com> > > The error return variable ret is initialized to zero and then is > checked to see if it is non-zero in the if-block that follows it. > It is therefore impossible for ret to be non-zero after the if-block > hence the check is redundant and can be removed. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1021040 ("Logically dead code") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>