On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 08:51:02AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
>
> The error return variable ret is initialized to zero and then is
> checked to see if it is non-zero in the if-block that follows it.
> It is therefore impossible for ret to be non-zero after the if-block
> hence the check is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1021040 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dste...@suse.com>
