> So I propose testing the attached trivial patch. It doesn’t work. The call stack is the same.
100.00% (ffffffff821af140)
|
---wait_on_page_bit
__migration_entry_wait
migration_entry_wait
do_swap_page
__handle_mm_fault
handle_mm_fault
__do_page_fault
do_page_fault
page_fault
|
|--40.62%--0x123a2
| start_thread
|
> It may not do anything at all.
> But the existing code is actually doing extra work just to be fragile, in
> case the
> scenario above can happen.
>
> Comments?
>
> Linus

