Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Eric W. Biederman
> <ebied...@xmission.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is my tested version of the patch.
>
> Can you please take my cleanups to devpts_ptmx_path() too?

Let met take a look.  

> Those 'goto err' statements are disgusting, when a plain 'return
> -ERRNO' works cleaner.

Yes those look like good cleanups.  I had tried to preserve the original
logic in devpts_ptmx_path from devpts_acquire to make it easier to
see if I had goofed.   But that out and out failed so cleanups
so the code is easier to read look like a very good thing.

> And that "struct file *filp = NULL;" is bogus - you added the NULL
> initialization because you mis-used "filp" early, and with that fixed
> it's just garbage.

Actually the NULL initialization is a hold over from the original
version of that function.  But I agree without it gcc could have
caught my use of the wrong variable, so removing it looks like a good
idea.

> Other than that, it looks fine to me.

Thanks.  I will respin and retest and see where things are at.

Eric

Reply via email to