On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:53:39AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work > > > > > > I think it must be distinguished with what it actually waits for, e.i. > > > completion > > > variables instead of work or wq. I will make it next week and let you > > > know. > > > > So no. The existing annotations are strictly better than relying on > > cross-release. > > Thank you for exaplanation but, as I already said, this is why I said > "I don't think it's the same level currently. But, I can make it with > some modification." to TJ: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1479560.html > > And also I mentioned we might need the current code inevitably but, the > existing annotations are never good and why here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1480173.html
I can read the words, but have no idea what you're trying to say.
