> On 2017年9月9日, at 下午12:35, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 6:25 PM, 严海双 <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 2017年9月9日, at 上午6:13, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Haishuang Yan
>>> <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>>>> Different namespace application might require different maximal number
>>>> of TCP sockets independently of the host.
>>>
>>> So after your patch we could have N * net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans
>>> in a whole system, right? This just makes OOM easier to trigger.
>>>
>>
>> From my understanding, before the patch, we had N *
>> net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans,
>> and after the patch, we could have ns1.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans +
>> ns2.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans
>> + ns3.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans, is that right? Thanks for your reviewing.
>
> Nope, by N I mean the number of containers. Before your patch, the limit
> is global, after your patch it is per container.
>
Yeah, for example, if there is N containers, before the patch, I mean the limit
is:
N * net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans
After the patch, the limit is:
ns1. net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans + ns2.
net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_max_orphans + …
