When a DSA switch tree is meant to be applied, it already has a CPU
port. Thus remove the condition of dst->cpu_dp.

Moreover, the next lines access dst->cpu_dp unconditionally.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com>
---
 net/dsa/dsa2.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index 873af0108e24..bd19304f862f 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -433,11 +433,9 @@ static int dsa_dst_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
                        return err;
        }
 
-       if (dst->cpu_dp) {
-               err = dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(dst->cpu_dp);
-               if (err)
-                       return err;
-       }
+       err = dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(dst->cpu_dp);
+       if (err)
+               return err;
 
        /* If we use a tagging format that doesn't have an ethertype
         * field, make sure that all packets from this point on get
@@ -474,10 +472,8 @@ static void dsa_dst_unapply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst)
                dsa_ds_unapply(dst, ds);
        }
 
-       if (dst->cpu_dp) {
-               dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_restore(dst->cpu_dp);
-               dst->cpu_dp = NULL;
-       }
+       dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_restore(dst->cpu_dp);
+       dst->cpu_dp = NULL;
 
        pr_info("DSA: tree %d unapplied\n", dst->tree);
        dst->applied = false;
-- 
2.14.1

Reply via email to