Hi,

Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshi...@ispras.ru> writes:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c 
>>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
>>> index 84dcbcd756f0..a305f8392082 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/pch_udc.c
>>> @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static struct usb_request 
>>> *pch_udc_alloc_request(struct usb_ep *usbep,
>>>     req->req.dma = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
>>>     req->dma = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
>>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->queue);
>>> -   if (!ep->dev->dma_addr)
>>> +   if (ep->dev->dma_addr != DMA_ADDR_INVALID)
>>>             return &req->req;
>>>     /* ep0 in requests are allocated from data pool here */
>>>     dma_desc = dma_pool_alloc(ep->dev->data_requests, gfp,
>>> @@ -1879,6 +1879,13 @@ static int pch_udc_pcd_queue(struct usb_ep *usbep, 
>>> struct usb_request *usbreq,
>>>                                                       usbreq->length,
>>>                                                       DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>>             }
>>> +           if (dma_mapping_error(&dev->pdev->dev, req->dma)) {
>>> +                   req->dma = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
>>> +                   retval = -ENOMEM;
>>> +                   if ((unsigned long)(usbreq->buf) & 0x03)
>>> +                           kfree(req->buf);
>>> +                   goto probe_end;
>>> +           }
>>>             req->dma_mapped = 1;
>>>     }
>>>     if (usbreq->length > 0) {
>>> @@ -2961,6 +2968,10 @@ static int init_dma_pools(struct pch_udc_dev *dev)
>>>     dev->dma_addr = dma_map_single(&dev->pdev->dev, ep0out_buf,
>>>                                    UDC_EP0OUT_BUFF_SIZE * 4,
>>>                                    DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>>> +   if (dma_mapping_error(&dev->pdev->dev, dev->dma_addr)) {
>>> +           dev->dma_addr = DMA_ADDR_INVALID;
>>> +           return -ENOMEM;
>>> +   }
>> 
>> Wouldn't this driver be better off using the
>> usb_gadget_{map,unmap}_request() functions provided by UDC core.c?
>> dma_mapping_error() is provided for free that way.
>> 
>
> I think so, but it requires quite significant rework of the driver.
> I would not do that without access to hardware.

I'd prefer to see a conversion to the generic helpers.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to