Hi Dmitry,
> > > > +static void s6sy761_report_coordinates(struct s6sy761_data *sdata, u8
> > > > *event)
> > > > +{
> > > > + u8 tid = ((event[0] & S6SY761_MASK_TID) >> 2) - 1;
> > >
> > > Should we make sure that event[0] & S6SY761_MASK_TID is not 0?
> >
> > I check event[0] already in s6sy761_handle_events (called by the
> > irq handler), if we get here event[0] is for sure positive...
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > +static void s6sy761_handle_events(struct s6sy761_data *sdata, u8
> > > > left_event)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < left_event; i++) {
> > > > + u8 *event = &sdata->data[i * S6SY761_EVENT_SIZE];
> > > > + u8 event_id = event[0] & S6SY761_MASK_EID;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!event[0])
> > > > + return;
> > ^^^^^^^^
> > ... exactly here.
> >
> > '!event[0]' means also to me that there is nothing left,
> > therefore I can discard whatever is next (given that there is
> > something left).
>
> What happens if you get event[0] == S6SY761_EVENT_ID_COORDINATE? I.e.
> the value is non-zero, but tid component is 0?
Oh, I see what you mean. It shouldn't happen, in anycase I can
put it under an 'unlikely' statement.
> > > > + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(&client->dev, client->irq, NULL,
> > > > + s6sy761_irq_handler,
> > > > + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > > > + "s6sy761_irq", sdata);
> > > > + if (err)
> > > > + return err;
> > > > +
> > > > + disable_irq(client->irq);
> > >
> > > Can you request IRQ after allocating and setting up the input device?
> > > Then you do not need to check for its presence in the interrupt handler.
> >
> > The reason I do it here is because the x and y are embedded in
> > the device itself. This means that I first need to enable the
> > device, read x and y and then register the input device.
> >
> > At power up I might expect an interrupt coming, thus I need to
> > check if 'input' is not 'NULL'.
>
> But you do not need interrupts to read x and y, right? So you can power
> device, create input device, set it up as needed, and then request irq,
> or am I missing something?
OK, all right. I'll do that. I will move the irq request after
the input registration.
Thanks again for your review,
Andi
