On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:27:52PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Use the %pS printk format for printing symbols from direct addresses.
> This is important for the ia64, ppc64 and parisc64 architectures, while on
> other architectures there is no difference between %pS and %pF.
> Fix it for consistency across the kernel.
i915.ko never runs on any of these, but if it helps with keeping things
consistent, why not.
Applied, thanks.
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airl...@linux.ie>
> Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> index 4e00e5c..29c62d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static unsigned long wait_timeout(void)
>
> static noinline void missed_breadcrumb(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> {
> - DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s missed breadcrumb at %pF, irq posted? %s, current
> seqno=%x, last=%x\n",
> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s missed breadcrumb at %pS, irq posted? %s, current
> seqno=%x, last=%x\n",
> engine->name, __builtin_return_address(0),
> yesno(test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB,
> &engine->irq_posted)),
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
