Artem Savkov <asav...@redhat.com> wrote: > I might be wrong but it doesn't look like xfrm_state_lock is required > for xfrm_policy_cache_flush and calling it under this lock triggers both > "sleeping function called from invalid context" and "possible circular > locking dependency detected" warnings on flush. > > Fixes: ec30d78c14a8 xfrm: add xdst pcpu cache > Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asav...@redhat.com>
You're right, its not needed (and wrong). Acked-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
