On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:41 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:27:54AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > Once ACCESS_ONCE is removed from the code in the tree > > it can also be removed from checkpatch > > Sure thing. We're expecting to rip that out with the ACCESS_ONCE > definitions in a post-Coccinelle patch.
This treewide series is one of the types that would be nice to have done at -rc1 via some external automated script service.
