On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:24:11 +0000
<mario.limoncie...@dell.com> wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pali Rohár [mailto:pali.ro...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:12 PM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario <mario_limoncie...@dell.com>
> > Cc: dvh...@infradead.org; Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com>;
> > LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org;
> > Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>; quasi...@google.com; r...@rjwysocki.net;
> > mj...@google.com; h...@lst.de; Greg KH <g...@kroah.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 13/14] platform/x86: wmi: create character devices 
> > when
> > requested by drivers
> > 
> > On Monday 09 October 2017 17:51:51 Mario Limonciello wrote:  
> > > + /* make sure we're not calling a higher instance than exists*/
> > > + if (_IOC_NR(cmd) > wblock->gblock.instance_count - 1)
> > > +         return -EINVAL;  
> > 
> > Is this condition really working? instance_count is unsigned, cmd is
> > also unsigned... and when instance_count is zero, then IIRC error would
> > not be thrown.
> >   
> 
> But instance count can't be zero.  MOF would fall apart with a zero instance 
> count.
> If a broken BIOS was shipped with an instance count of zero bigger problems 
> would
> have happened.

Maybe but you can still write the test correctly using >= instead.

Alan

Reply via email to