On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote: > On 10/12/2017 08:42 AM, Bhumika Goyal wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> wrote: >>> On 10/12/2017 04:19 AM, Bhumika Goyal wrote: >>>> This is a followup patch for: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375 and >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/ >>>> >>>> Make these structures const as they are either passed to the functions >>>> having the argument as const or stored as a reference in the "ci_type" >>>> const field of a config_item structure. >>> >>> Thanks, applied. >>> >> >> Hello, >> >> Actually, this patch is dependent on the patches in the links >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/11/375 and >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9999649/. Therefore, this patch >> won't be correct unless the patches in these links gets applied. > > Gah, I do see that now. That should have been made much clearer in > the patch description! > > When you send out patches with hard dependencies like that, either > wait until the dependency has been solved in mainline, or make it > explicitly clear in the patch submission. >
Sorry, for not mentioning the dependencies clearly. I will keep the pointer in mind. Thanks, Bhumika > -- > Jens Axboe >
