On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:53:10 -0700 Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 08:47:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> To clarify: with my gcc-4.9/gcc-5 build, -mstack-protector-guard=tls
> >> has no effect,
> >> the output is the same as with -mstack-protector-guard=global using the
> >> Ubuntu
> >> compilers of the same version.
> >
> > Jumping in here... on IRC Arnd suggested reverting 123c48cf899d
> > ("Makefile: introduce CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO") from -next. What
> > do you think Kees?
>
> Until we sort this out, yes, agreed. Andrew, can you pull the patches?
Sure. All these?
sh-boot-add-static-stack-protector-to-pre-kernel.patch
makefile-move-stackprotector-availability-out-of-kconfig.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-2.patch
makefile-introduce-config_cc_stackprotector_auto-fix-3.patch
Mark, can you please drop those from -next also?
