On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:09:44PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> BTW., have you attempted limiting the depth of the stack traces? I suspect 
> more 
> than 2-4 are rarely required to disambiguate the calling context.

I did it for you. Let me show you the result.

1. No lockdep

 Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs):

       2.756558155 seconds time elapsed                    ( +-  0.09% )

2. Lockdep

 Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs):

       2.968710420 seconds time elapsed                    ( +-  0.12% )

3. Lockdep + Crossrelease 5 entries

 Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs):

       3.153839636 seconds time elapsed                    ( +-  0.31% )

4. Lockdep + Crossrelease 3 entries

 Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs):

       3.137205534 seconds time elapsed                    ( +-  0.87% )

5. Lockdep + Crossrelease + This patch

 Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs):

       2.963669551 seconds time elapsed                    ( +-  0.11% )

And I will add the result in commit message at the next spin.

Thanks,
Byungchul

Reply via email to