* Byungchul Park <byungchul.p...@lge.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:22:12AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > There's no current crash regression that I know of - I'm just outlining the
> > conditions of getting all this re-enabled in the next merge window.
> >
> > Instead of sending two series, could you please send a series that includes
> > both
> > these fixing + re-enabling patches, plus the false positive fixes?
> >
> > In particular I think the cross-release re-enabling should be done as the
> > last
> > patch, so that any future bisections of new false positives won't be made
> > more
> > difficult by re-introducing the old false positives near the end of the
> > bisection.
>
> I agree. But I already sent v2 before you told me..
>
> Do you want me to send patches fixing false positives in the thread
> fixing performance regression?
No need, I'll reorder them and let you know if there's any problem left.
Thanks,
Ingo
