On Wed, 2 May 2007 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > I'm astonished and impressed, both with Kconfig and your use of it: > > Thanks! > > > I'd much rather be testing a quicklist patch: > > I'd better give that a try. > > Great. But I certainly do not mind people use SLAB. I do not think that > one approach should be there for all. Choice is the way to have multiple > allocators compete. One reason that SLAB is so crusty is because it was > the only solution for so long. > noooo, we don't want competing slab allocators, please. We should get slub working well on all architectures then remove slab completely. Having to maintain both slab.c and slub.c would be awful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
