On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > noooo, we don't want competing slab allocators, please. We should get slub > working well on all architectures then remove slab completely. Having to > maintain both slab.c and slub.c would be awful.
Owww... You throw my roadmap out of the window and may create too high expectations of SLUB. I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it will be much easier once the cleanups are in. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
