I find the '.ifeq <expression>' directive to be confusing.  Reading it
quickly seems to suggest its opposite meaning, or that it's missing an
argument.

Improve readability by replacing all of its x86 uses with
'.if <expression> == 0'.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index f6cdb7a1455e..846e84a1d1f7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym)
 
        ASM_CLAC
 
-       .ifeq \has_error_code
+       .if \has_error_code == 0
        pushq   $-1                             /* ORIG_RAX: no syscall to 
restart */
        .endif
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
index 9ed3074d0d27..6e50f87765e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ ENTRY(early_idt_handler_array)
        # 24(%rsp) error code
        i = 0
        .rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
-       .ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
+       .if ((EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1) == 0
        pushl $0                # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform
        .endif
        pushl $i                # 20(%esp) Vector number
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
index 99b1262c8a81..48875910607d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ ENDPROC(start_cpu0)
 ENTRY(early_idt_handler_array)
        i = 0
        .rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
-       .ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1
+       .if ((EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1) == 0
                UNWIND_HINT_IRET_REGS
                pushq $0        # Dummy error code, to make stack frame uniform
        .else
-- 
2.13.6

Reply via email to