Sorry, I sent this one but forgot that timer_setup_on_stack() is in -next only. If it's okay, I can carry it in the timers tree.
Thanks! -Kees On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> writes: > >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. Also adds missing call to >> destroy_timer_on_stack(); >> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> >> Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> >> Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu> >> Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsi...@embeddedor.com> >> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> > > -- > balbi -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
