2017-10-27 20:21 UTC+02:00, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>: > > * Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org> wrote: > >> 2017-10-27 19:06 UTC+02:00, Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>: >> > >> > * Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org> wrote: >> > >> >> 2017-10-27 15:58 UTC+02:00, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>: >> >> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:06:25AM -0700, tip-bot for Frederic >> >> > Weisbecker >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> + isolcpus= [KNL,SMP] Isolate a given set of CPUs from >> >> >> disturbance. >> >> >> + Format: [flag-list,]<cpu-list> >> >> >> + >> >> >> + Specify one or more CPUs to isolate from >> >> >> disturbances >> >> >> + specified in the flag list (default: domain): >> >> >> + >> >> >> + nohz >> >> >> + Disable the tick when a single task runs. >> >> >> + domain >> >> >> + Isolate from the general SMP balancing and >> >> >> scheduling >> >> >> + algorithms. This option is the preferred way >> >> >> to isolate >> >> >> + CPUs from tasks. >> >> > >> >> > I _strongly_ object to this statement, isolcpus is _not_ the >> >> > preferred >> >> > way, cpusets are. >> >> > >> >> > And yes, while cpusets suffers some problems, we _should_ really fix >> >> > those and not promote this piece of shit isolcpus crap. >> >> >> >> I definitely agree with that so your position is a relief :-) This >> >> patch only indented the existing parameter documentation so fixing its >> >> content was beyond its scope. I'll send a patch to correct the text. >> > >> > Since it was the last commit in tip:sched/core that was pushed out just >> > hours ago >> > I zapped that last commit, please send an updated patch which we can >> > apply >> > and get >> > a clean series. >> > >> > Thanks, >> >> Note the issue was there before that patch. But nevermind I'll resend >> an updated version of the patch. > > Yeah - so we get a single 'improve documentation' commit.
Ah ok I see. No problem I'll resend. Thanks.
