On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org> wrote: > How quickly do you need static_branch_disable() executed? You could > always pass the work off to a worker thread (that can schedule). > > random_ready_callback -> initiates worker thread -> enables the static branch
I had already suggested that much earlier in the thread, but discounted it in the very same suggestion, because that branch turns out to be not that expensive anyway, and I think it's more important that we're able to print meaningful values as soon as we can, rather than waiting for the scheduler.
