On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 06:02:53PM +0000, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> As you said, the legacy code doesn't follow spec naming strictly
> and the spec doesn't have uniform naming convention either. We are
> contacting spec author to see if we can follow the same naming
> convention in the future specs.
Whatever you do, you should change it before it hits mainline because
then it becomes user-space visible. So you can fix the kernel format
first and then concentrate on changing the spec.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
