Hello Ludovic, On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:55:42PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 05:12:00PM +0200, Juergen Fitschen wrote: > > Slave mode driver is based on the concept of i2c-designware driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Fitschen <m...@jue.yt> > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile | 3 + > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-core.c | 13 +++- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-slave.c | 147 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.h | 30 +++++++- > > 4 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-slave.c > > > > Adding an example in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt > could be useful.
I will add this. > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > > index 2a79c3d..b38fb8e9 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Makefile > > @@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ALTERA) += i2c-altera.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ASPEED) += i2c-aspeed.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_AT91) += i2c-at91.o > > i2c-at91-objs := i2c-at91-core.o i2c-at91-master.o > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE),y) > > + i2c-at91-objs += i2c-at91-slave.o > > +endif > > As Designware driver, I would add an entry in 'I2C Hardware Bus > Support'. > > If a user wants to use the I2C GPIO driver as the I2C slave (once it has > the slave support), it's not useful to embed i2c-at91-slave code. Good point. > > +void at91_init_twi_bus_slave(struct at91_twi_dev *dev) > > +{ > > + at91_twi_write(dev, AT91_TWI_CR, AT91_TWI_MSDIS); > > + if (dev->slave_detected && dev->smr) { > > slave_detected has been checked in the caller. smr has been set just > before calling at91_init_twi_bus(). Whoops! Better safe than sorry ;) I will remove that check. Thank you for testing everything! I am curious about how the other MPUs will perform with the patchset. I have a SAMA5D35 at hand and can test everything on this MPU in the next days. Best regards Juergen