On 11/07/2017 09:35 AM, naresh.kamb...@linaro.org wrote: > From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org>
Odd to see this From: line in the patch. Could you take a look and see where this is coming from? Your gitconfig perhaps. I have to fix this up when I apply the patch which I would like to avoid. > > On ARM and ARM64 devices kernel source tree is not available so > insmod "$SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" is not working. > > On these target devices the test_bpf.ko is installed under > /lib/modules/`uname -r`/kernel/lib/ > so use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf.ko module and > insert for testing. > > Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh > index 2e5a1049e2f2..4757ca7d163c 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh > @@ -14,6 +14,16 @@ test_run() > if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then > rc=1 > fi > + else > + # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module > + if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then > + echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]" > + elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then > + echo "test_bpf: ok" > + else > + echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]" > + rc=1 > + fi > fi > rmmod test_bpf 2> /dev/null > dmesg | grep FAIL > Okay now I am with you on the changes you are making in Patch v3 1/2 and this one. Please collapse these two patches into one or fix the SRC_TREE problem first and then fix the missing module case. I would like to get an Ack from net-dev folks before getting these in. Alexei and Daniel! Please review and let me know if you good with this change. thanks, -- Shuah
