Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> wrote: > > TBH, I've no idea how bpf does anything, so I can't say whether this is > > better, overkill or insufficient. > > ok. To make it clear: > Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> > For the current patch. > Unnecessary checks for no good reason in performance critical > functions are not acceptable.
They aren't unnecessary checks. Can you please suggest if there's some way more suitable than just killing bpf entirely? I don't know the code, and I presume you do. David
