On 2017-11-09 11:38 AM, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 11:34:19AM -0800, Patrick McLean wrote: > >>> In particular, there are *no* nfsd changes in that 4.13.8..4.13.11 >>> range. There is a bunch of xfs changes, though. What's the underlying >>> filesystem that you are exporting? >> >> It's an ext4 filesystem. > > Had there been toolchain changes around the same period? > No changes, both the working and broken kernels were built with distro-provided gcc 5.4.0 and binutils 2.28.1.
- [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regression i... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regressi... Al Viro
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regressi... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regr... Al Viro
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking ... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regressi... Al Viro
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking regr... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware breaking ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware brea... Al Viro
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware brea... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware ... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardware ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardw... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardw... Patrick McLean
- Re: [nfsd4] potentially hardw... Linus Torvalds