On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:13:42PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 11/11/2017 05:38 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > A helper purported to look up a child node based on its name was using > > the wrong of-helper and ended up prematurely freeing the parent of-node > > while leaking any matching node. > > > > To make things worse, any matching node would not even necessarily be a > > child node as the whole device tree was searched depth-first starting at > > the parent. > > I think it is the same case as with the twl6040, there were no > of_get_child_by_name() when this was done... > > Thanks for fixing it! > > Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <[email protected]>
Thanks for the acks. Johan
