On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:11:14AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > I agree; the only thing I think really has to be done is putting a comment > > there, explaining why forcing implies infinite module reference (and also > > perhaps making it therefore even more obvious from documentation, that > > this really is a last-resort-"you-know-what-you-are-doing" kind of knob). > > Miroslav, could you please just send v2 of 2/2, so that I can apply it? > > Josh, given your latest comment I assume that your Ack holds even for v2 > with the proposed ammendment (perhaps with an extra comment), unless you > tell me otherwise.
Yeah, that's fine. -- Josh
