On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 09:53 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:17:46 +0200 > Vladislav Valtchev <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 11:48 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > Is there a reason that init_instance() isn't called in > > > init_common_record_context()? > > > > > > > Hi Steven, > > > > init_instance() has been put into init_common_record_context() later, > > in patch 8, "Making start,extract,stream,profile separate funcs". > > I have to ask. Why isn't it done in this patch. This patch appears to > be the proper place to put it. >
There is no reason, actually. You're absolutely right. It's a leftover from several iterations of fixes (originally 'instance' was not part of ctx). Therefore, I'll move that call to init_instance() inside init_common_record_context(). Vlad
