On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 05:00:19PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:54:46PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Em Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:43:25AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:52:12AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Right, since we want to honour what the distro makers decided was the > > > > best set for them, and to be able to link with other libraries, etc. > > > > > > But then I think this should be done more explicitely, right? Do you > > > > envision some way to do that without having to try to build perl or > > > > python, that may not be installed, etc? > > > > > I'll check on it.. I think we could use feature detection and > > > enable that by default and add NO_HARDENED_BUILD variable as > > > we do for features.. and detect that python/perl or whatever > > > else is using that and warn > > > > > > Of course users wanting to use something different may just set CFLAGS > > > > and be done with it, in which case I think this should also affect the > > > > perl and python CFLAGS, removing that distro specific stuff since the > > > > user is changing something different. > > > > > yep > > > > Even with this patch applied, as a stopgap solution to allow me to build > > a full featured tool on f27, I get this leftover: > > > > LINK /tmp/build/perf/perf > > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/build/perf/libperf.a(libperf-in.o): relocation > > R_X86_64_32S against symbol `inat_primary_table' can not be used when > > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > > > Looking at the Intel PT bits now... > > Nevermind, I did a full rebuild and this is not there anymore, some > build artifact with that file :-\
I keep posponing this fix.. maybe I should update to F27 ;-) I'll send new version soon jirka