On 30/11/17 15:54, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 30-Nov 14:36, Juri Lelli wrote:
[...] > > I wonder if we would also need some way to trigger a back to back update > > as soon as a currently running one finishes and an RT/DL task asked for > > an update (without waiting for the next tick). > > Good point, I think that would actually be an interesting > optimization. We already discussed that in the past, but refrained by > adding more on top of this already "substantial" set of changes. > > Can we think about that once we decided about some patches of this > series? Definitely yes for me. One bit at a time. :) Best, Juri
