On 30-Nov 17:12, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 30/11/17 16:02, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > On 30-Nov 14:41, Juri Lelli wrote: > > [...] > > > > If the DL changes (which I shall post again as soon as tip/sched/core is > > > bumped up to 4.15-rc1) get in first, this is going to be useless (as the > > > DL kthread gets ignored by the scheduling class itself). But, this looks > > > good to me "in the meantime". > > > > Just to better understand, you mean that the DL kthread does not send > > out schedutil updates? > > It doesn't have a "proper" bandwidth (utilization) :/. So it gets > "unnoticed" and schedutil updates are not triggered.
Ah, right... that was the "let CBS ignore this DL task" solution! ;-) > > > > If that's the case I agree we can discard this patch... that's also > > one of the reasons why I move it at the end of this series. > > Not sure about this though, not my call :). I guess this still helps > until we get the DL changes in. Yes, agree... well Viresh had some concerns about this patch. Let see what he thinks. > Best, > > Juri -- #include <best/regards.h> Patrick Bellasi
