Hi,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:37:12PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> From: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
>
> The at24 driver creates dummy I2C devices to access offsets in the chip
> that are outside the area supported using a single I2C address. It is not
> meaningful to use runtime PM to such devices; the system firmware (ACPI)
> does not know about these devices nor runtime PM was enabled for them.
> Always use the real device instead of the dummy ones.
>
> Fixes: 98e8201039af ("eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support")
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Sven Van Asbroeck on a 24AA16/24LC16B <[email protected]>
> [Bartosz: rebased on top of previous fixes for 4.15, tweaked the
> commit message]
> [Sven: fixed Bartosz's rebase]
> Signed-off-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
I presume this is the final one. Yeah, the client variable was effectively
unused in the earlier version. Seems good to me.
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 305a7a4..20b4f26 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_eeprom_write_i2c(struct at24_data
> *at24, const char *buf,
> static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
> {
> struct at24_data *at24 = priv;
> - struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct device *dev = &at24->client[0]->dev;
> char *buf = val;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -572,11 +572,9 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
> if (off + count > at24->chip.byte_len)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &off);
> -
> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pm_runtime_put_noidle(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -592,7 +590,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
> status = at24->read_func(at24, buf, off, count);
> if (status < 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
> - pm_runtime_put(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> return status;
> }
> buf += status;
> @@ -602,7 +600,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
>
> mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
>
> - pm_runtime_put(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -610,7 +608,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
> static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
> {
> struct at24_data *at24 = priv;
> - struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct device *dev = &at24->client[0]->dev;
> char *buf = val;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -620,11 +618,9 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
> if (off + count > at24->chip.byte_len)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - client = at24_translate_offset(at24, &off);
> -
> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pm_runtime_put_noidle(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -640,7 +636,7 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
> status = at24->write_func(at24, buf, off, count);
> if (status < 0) {
> mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
> - pm_runtime_put(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
> return status;
> }
> buf += status;
> @@ -650,7 +646,7 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void
> *val, size_t count)
>
> mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
>
> - pm_runtime_put(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put(dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Sakari Ailus
[email protected]
