On 12/04/2017 05:03 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Tushar, On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:01:23AM +0530, Tushar Dave wrote:On 11/23/2017 04:43 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:40:52AM +0530, Tushar Dave wrote:On 11/21/2017 06:11 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:Hello, FYI this happens in mainline kernel 4.14.0-01330-g3c07399. It happens since 4.13 . It occurs in 3 out of 162 boots. [ 44.637743] advantechwdt: Unexpected close, not stopping watchdog! [ 44.997548] input: ImExPS/2 Generic Explorer Mouse as /devices/platform/i8042/serio1/input/input6 [ 45.013419] e1000 0000:00:03.0: disabling already-disabled device [ 45.013447] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 45.014868] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 71 at drivers/pci/pci.c:1641 pci_disable_device+0xa1/0x105: pci_disable_device at drivers/pci/pci.c:1640 [ 45.016171] CPU: 1 PID: 71 Comm: rcu_perf_shutdo Not tainted 4.14.0-01330-g3c07399 #1 [ 45.017197] task: ffff88011bee9e40 task.stack: ffffc90000860000 [ 45.017987] RIP: 0010:pci_disable_device+0xa1/0x105: pci_disable_device at drivers/pci/pci.c:1640 [ 45.018603] RSP: 0000:ffffc90000863e30 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 45.019282] RAX: 0000000000000035 RBX: ffff88013a230008 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 45.020182] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000203 [ 45.021084] RBP: ffff88013a3f31e8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 45.021986] R10: ffffffff827ec29c R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001 [ 45.022946] R13: ffff88013a230008 R14: ffff880117802b20 R15: ffffc90000863e8f [ 45.023842] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88013fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 45.024863] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 45.025583] CR2: ffffc900006d4000 CR3: 000000000220f000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 [ 45.026478] Call Trace: [ 45.026811] __e1000_shutdown+0x1d4/0x1e2: __e1000_shutdown at drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:5162 [ 45.027344] ? rcu_perf_cleanup+0x2a1/0x2a1: rcu_perf_shutdown at kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c:627 [ 45.027883] e1000_shutdown+0x14/0x3a: e1000_shutdown at drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c:5235 [ 45.028351] device_shutdown+0x110/0x1aa: device_shutdown at drivers/base/core.c:2807 [ 45.028858] kernel_power_off+0x31/0x64: kernel_power_off at kernel/reboot.c:260 [ 45.029343] rcu_perf_shutdown+0x9b/0xa7: rcu_perf_shutdown at kernel/rcu/rcuperf.c:637 [ 45.029852] ? __wake_up_common_lock+0xa2/0xa2: autoremove_wake_function at kernel/sched/wait.c:376 [ 45.030414] kthread+0x126/0x12e: kthread at kernel/kthread.c:233 [ 45.030834] ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x8e/0x8e: kthread at kernel/kthread.c:190 [ 45.031399] ? ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30: ret_from_fork at arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:443 [ 45.031883] ? kernel_init+0xa/0xf5: kernel_init at init/main.c:997 [ 45.032325] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30: ret_from_fork at arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:443 [ 45.032777] Code: 00 48 85 ed 75 07 48 8b ab a8 00 00 00 48 8d bb 98 00 00 00 e8 aa d1 11 00 48 89 ea 48 89 c6 48 c7 c7 d8 e4 0b 82 e8 55 7d da ff <0f> ff b9 01 00 00 00 31 d2 be 01 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 f0 b1 61 82 [ 45.035222] ---[ end trace c257137b1b1976ef ]--- [ 45.037838] ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S5 Attached the full dmesg, kconfig and reproduce scripts.Looks like e1000 pci/pxi-x device is already suspended. And therefore call to e1000_suspend() -> __e1000_shutdown() -> pci_disable_device() already had disabled the device. Disabling device again by e1000_shutdown handler during system shutdown causes warning at drivers/pci/pci.c:1641. I think function __e1000_shutdown should just return if device is already suspended! I don't have e1000 hardware to test right now. So if this seems logical to others I will send a patch.Tushar, it happens on QEMU boot testing, so do not rely on e1000 HW. Unless you'd like to prevent regressions on real HW. The original report attached a reproduce script to run the QEMU test. Or you may send me the patch for testing.Fengguang, Would you please try this patch and test. The patch is compile tested only. The patch is similar to how ixgbe handled the issue. Thanks. e1000: fix disabling already-disabled warning This patch adds check so that driver does not disable already disabled device.It works! I tried 100 boots and the "e1000 0000:00:03.0: disabling already-disabled device" error no longer show up. Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com>
Fengguang, Thanks for testing. I will send patch soon. -Tushar
Thanks, FengguangSigned-off-by: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.d...@oracle.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h | 3 ++-drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h index d7bdea7..8fd2458 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000.h @@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ struct e1000_adapter { enum e1000_state_t { __E1000_TESTING, __E1000_RESETTING, - __E1000_DOWN + __E1000_DOWN, + __E1000_DISABLED }; #undef pr_fmt diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c index 1982f79..a7de31d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static int e1000_init_hw_struct(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) { struct net_device *netdev; - struct e1000_adapter *adapter; + struct e1000_adapter *adapter = NULL; struct e1000_hw *hw; static int cards_found; @@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) u16 tmp = 0; u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME; int bars, need_ioport; + bool disable_dev = false; /* do not allocate ioport bars when not needed */ need_ioport = e1000_is_need_ioport(pdev); @@ -1259,11 +1260,13 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent) iounmap(hw->ce4100_gbe_mdio_base_virt); iounmap(hw->hw_addr); err_ioremap: + disable_dev = !test_and_set_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags); free_netdev(netdev); err_alloc_etherdev: pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, bars); err_pci_reg: - pci_disable_device(pdev); + if (!adapter || disable_dev) + pci_disable_device(pdev); return err; } @@ -1281,6 +1284,7 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; + bool disable_dev; e1000_down_and_stop(adapter); e1000_release_manageability(adapter); @@ -1299,9 +1303,11 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) iounmap(hw->flash_address); pci_release_selected_regions(pdev, adapter->bars); + disable_dev = !test_and_set_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags); free_netdev(netdev); - pci_disable_device(pdev); + if (disable_dev) + pci_disable_device(pdev); } /** @@ -5156,7 +5162,8 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool *enable_wake) if (netif_running(netdev)) e1000_free_irq(adapter); - pci_disable_device(pdev); + if (!test_and_set_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags)) + pci_disable_device(pdev); return 0; } @@ -5200,6 +5207,8 @@ static int e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev) pr_err("Cannot enable PCI device from suspend\n"); return err; } + smp_mb__before_atomic(); + clear_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags); pci_set_master(pdev); pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, 0); @@ -5274,7 +5283,9 @@ static pci_ers_result_t e1000_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev, if (netif_running(netdev)) e1000_down(adapter); - pci_disable_device(pdev); + + if (!test_and_set_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags)) + pci_disable_device(pdev); /* Request a slot slot reset. */ return PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET; @@ -5302,6 +5313,8 @@ static pci_ers_result_t e1000_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev) pr_err("Cannot re-enable PCI device after reset.\n"); return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT; } + smp_mb__before_atomic(); + clear_bit(__E1000_DISABLED, &adapter->flags); pci_set_master(pdev); pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, 0); -- 1.8.3.1 -TusharThanks, Fengguang
