* Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:
> Better ensure we actually hold the lock using lockdep than just commenting
> on it. Due to the various exported _locked interfaces it is far too easy
> to get the locking wrong.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> ---
> kernel/sched/wait.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> index 98feab7933c7..347c06c8222e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static int __wake_up_common(struct wait_queue_head
> *wq_head, unsigned int mode,
> wait_queue_entry_t *curr, *next;
> int cnt = 0;
>
> + lockdep_assert_held(&wq_head->lock);
> +
> if (bookmark && (bookmark->flags & WQ_FLAG_BOOKMARK)) {
> curr = list_next_entry(bookmark, entry);
Makes sense. Would you like to carry this patch together with the epoll patch,
to
be able to test them both? If yes then:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
... otherwise I can pick this up into the scheduler tree as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
