Julia Cartwright writes: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:57:59AM -0600, Gratian Crisan wrote: >> >> Peter Zijlstra writes: >> > The below compiles and boots, but is otherwise untested. Could you give >> > it a spin? >> >> Thank you! Yes, I'll start a test now. > > I gave it a spin with my minimal reproducing case w/ the strategic > msleep(). Previously, I could reproduce it in less than a minute in > that setup; now it's been running for a couple hours. So ... looks > good? :)
Yep ... looks good to me. I've been running two targets with the original reproducer for 8 hours now plus a target running the C test. All of them are still going. I'm going to let them run overnight to make sure but I'm going to call it fixed. -Gratian
