On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > > I'll try to get to this in a day or so -- is that okay? Or should we > do some trivial fix/revert and fix it for real next time around?
I don't think we want some trivial fix/revert just to keep it working.
This code is too fragile as-is, and I think that "make it work" is
more than reverting. You did fix real issues on x86-64 with odd
segment use, for example.
Linus
