On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 Elena Reshetova <elena.reshet...@intel.com> wrote:
> Some functions from refcount_t API provide different > memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. > This adds a document outlining these differences ( > Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as > some other minor improvements. I've applied this, thanks, it looks good. One thing I noticed, though, is that this landed in the core-api manual, while the refcount_t documentation is in the driver-api manual. The cross-references work just fine and such, but this still doesn't seem quite right. Probably what should be done is to have all the refcount_t material in core-api; I may do that if I get a moment. Thanks, jon
