* Darren Hart <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: "Darren Hart (VMware)" <[email protected]>
> 
> uaddr alignment is currently tested by get_futex_key(). We can catch
> misalignment earlier in sys_futex and return -EINVAL sooner. This
> simplifies get_futex_key() a little, but more importantly exits the
> kernel as soon as an invalid parameter is detected.
> 
> Passes all selftests/futex testcases on a dual socket Xeon E5-2670, 16
> physical cores total, 32 threads total.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <[email protected]>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/futex.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 76ed592..c3ee6c4 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -509,8 +509,6 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union 
> futex_key *key, int rw)
>        * The futex address must be "naturally" aligned.
>        */
>       key->both.offset = address % PAGE_SIZE;
> -     if (unlikely((address % sizeof(u32)) != 0))
> -             return -EINVAL;
>       address -= key->both.offset;
>  
>       if (unlikely(!access_ok(rw, uaddr, sizeof(u32))))
> @@ -3525,6 +3523,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, 
> u32, val,
>       u32 val2 = 0;
>       int cmd = op & FUTEX_CMD_MASK;
>  
> +     /* Only allow for aligned uaddr variables */
> +     if (unlikely((unsigned long)uaddr % sizeof(u32) != 0 ||
> +                  (unsigned long)uaddr2 % sizeof(u32) != 0))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       if (utime && (cmd == FUTEX_WAIT || cmd == FUTEX_LOCK_PI ||
>                     cmd == FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET ||
>                     cmd == FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI)) {

Yeah, so I applied this yesterday, then -tip started regressing sporadically 
during distro networking bring-up, and it took me half a day of debugging to 
statistically bisect it back to this patch :-/

So it's apparently broken, but I don't see yet how.

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to